|
You
are not alone!
Many men
and women think they are the only one with a hair problem, while in fact 90%
of all men and women have at least a few unwanted hairs. Electrolysis
is the only permanent method of hair removal approved by physicians and
health professionals as safe, effective and permanent. Since its discovery in
1875 by Dr. Charles E. Michel, many major advances have been made through the
use of highly sophisticated technology and professional skill.
We all get tired of unwanted hair. We pluck, tweeze, wax, trim,
bleach, and use depilatories but it always comes back or becomes dark again.
Electrology has withstood the test of time for its Safety, Effectiveness, and
Permanency for most Men and Women of all Nationalities.
Electrolysis facts
Basic facts
Permanent
hair removal for most consumers if performed correctly (which requires
considerable training and skill).
Description
A
hair-thin metal probe is slid into a hair follicle.
Proper
insertion does not puncture the skin.
Electricity
is delivered to the follicle through the probe, which causes localized
damage to the areas that generate hairs.
Advantages
By
far the best and longest track record of results.
Over
125 years of clinically proven safety and effectiveness. [1]
Disadvantages
Can
be expensive.
Can
be painful.
Can
be tedious.
Can
be difficult for large amounts of hair.
If
done improperly, it can result in:
partial
to full regrowth
lasting
skin damage
spread
of infection
Regulation
varies by state, so inadequate controls exist to ensure competent
practitioners.
Regrowth
rates have not been accurately established and cannot be predicted due to
numerous variables.
|
History Although several researchers were
apparently experimenting with electrical epilation after
the Civil War, it's generally accepted that St. Louis
ophthalmologist Charles Michel was the first to discover
and publish permanent hair removal results with an
electrified needle. [7]
In 1875, Dr. Michel reported he had been successfully
using a battery-powered needle epilator to treat ingrown
eyelashes (trichiasis) since 1869. [8] This DC powered
method was called electrolysis because a chemical
reaction in the hair follicle causes sodium hydroxide to
form, which damages the follicle. It's also sometimes
called galvanic electrolysis.
Use of electrolysis for hair removal continued
through the early part of the 20th century. Its
commercial popularity as a cosmetic treatment was
briefly eclipsed by x-ray hair removal, which was
advertised as both “painless” and “harmless” (only one
of which was true, of course).
Subsequent innovations in the field included the use
of multiple needles, developed by Paul Kree in 1916, and
the use of AC electricity, which causes thermal damage
within the follicle. [9] This was first reported in
medical literature in 1924 by Dr. Henri Bordier,
following over a decade of experimentation by numerous
researchers. [10] This method was called diathermy by
Bordier and is also called thermolysis, short-wave,
high-frequency (HF), radio-frequency (RF), etc.
Incremental improvements in the equipment and
technique continued through World War II. At that time,
Arthur Hinkel and Henri St. Pierre applied for a patent
for a blend method they'd been developing. They received
their patent in 1948, and 20 years later published the
groundbreaking book Electrolysis, Thermolysis and
the Blend, discussing their use of scientific
techniques to improve the method. [11] In the wake of
Hinkel's book, several other useful practical overviews
have been written. [4, 5, 6]
The second half of the 20th century saw more
incremental equipment improvements incorporating
transistors and computerized controls, as well as
insulated probes and sterile disposable probes.
Despite improvements in equipment, electrolysis
remains highly dependent on the skill of the
practitioner. Electrolysis trade groups have set
standards for member certification, but many U.S. states
do not regulate the practice of electrolysis. [12] For
this reason, it's very important for consumers to go to
a practitioner recommended by someone who is done and
happy with the results.
References
- Please see my selected list
of published
electrolysis medical literature.
- Caldwell IW.
The electronic pencil.
British Medical Journal,
1972, 03 Jun(813):591-592.
- Please see hairfacts.com for
a discussion of
home-use personal electrolysis
units: cons and pros.
- Gior
F. Modern Electrology: Excess
Hair, Its Causes and Treatments,
3d ed. 2000 and Published by
Hair Publishing, Inc., Roslyn,
New York 11576. (previous
edition from Tarrytown NY:
Milady Publishing, 1987) ISBN:
0-87350-413-5
- Richards RN, Meharg GE.
Cosmetic and Medical
Electrolysis and Temporary Hair
Removal: A practice manual and
reference guide. Toronto: Medric
Ltd. 1991. ISBN: 0-9694746-0-1.
Pages 37-40.
- Bono
M. Real world electrology: the
blend method. Santa Barbara, CA:
Tortoise Press, 1994. ISBN:
0-9642682-0-5
- But see Wagner RF Jr, Brysk
H, Tyring SK.
Revisiting the Michel/Green
controversy of 1879: was Carron
du Villards the first to use
probe/needle electrolysis for
permanent hair destruction?
International Journal of
Dermatology 1997
Dec;36(12):947-51.
- Michel CE. Trichiasis and
distichiasis; with an improved
method for radical treatment.
St. Louis Clinical Record, 1875
Oct; 2:145-148
- Richards (1991) page 39.
Available online via
American Electrology Association.
- Bordier H. [New treatment
for hypertrichosis with
diathermy]. Vie Medicale, 1924,
5:561 [article in French]
- Hinkel AR, Lind RW.
Electrolysis, Thermolysis and
the Blend: the principles and
practice of permanent hair
removal. Los Angeles, CA:
Arroway Publishers, 1968. ISBN
0-9600284-1-2
- Please see hairfacts.com for
a list of
states that regulate
electrolysis.
-
Chernosky ME.
Permanent
removal of superfluous hair.
Texas Medicine, 1971,
67:72-78.
-
Johnson E.
Epilation
of growing hair follicles.
Journal of Expermimental Zoology
1975 May;192(2):259-63.
- Wagner
RF Jr, Tomich JM, Grande DJ.
Electrolysis and thermolysis for
permanent hair removal.
Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology 1985
Mar;12(3):441-9.
- Hobbs
ER, Ratz JL, James B.
Electrosurgical epilation.
Dermatologic Clinics 1987
Apr;5(2):437-44.
- Vogt
HJ [Formation
of keloids after
electroepilation].
[Article in German] Hautarzt
1973 May;24(5):203-4.
-
Ditmars DM Jr, Maguina P.
Neck skin
sporotrichosis after
electrolysis.
Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery 1998 Feb;101(2):504-6.
-
Petrozzi JW.
Verrucae
planae spread by electrolysis.
Cutis, 1980, 26:85.
-
Dumesic DA, Herrmann RR, O'Brien
AM.
Estimated
prevalence of undiagnosed
glucose intolerance from
hyperandrogenic anovulation
among women requesting
electrolysis.
International Journal of
Fertility and Womens Medicine
1997 Jul-Aug;42(4):255-60.
-
Verdich J [Treatment of
hypertrichosis in women by means
of electroepilation]
Ugeskrift for Laeger,
141:2056-2057.
- Richards RN, Meharg GE.
Electrolysis: observations from
13 years and 140,000 hours of
experience. Journal of the
American Academy of Dermatology.
1995 Oct;33(4):662-6.
-
Kobayashi T, Kamiyama G.
Electroepilation using insulated
needles.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
1987;11(4):223-7.
-
Urushibata O, Kase K.
A
comparative study of axillar
hair removal in women: plucking
versus the blend method.
Journal of Dermatology 1995
Oct;22(10):738-42.
|
|
|
|
I offer a Complimentary
Initial Electrology Consultation and demonstration
All in Private.
Men & Women Welcome
|

"For a healthier happier you"

Skin Chart

No more shaving |