|
Many men and women think they are the only one with a hair
problem, while in fact 90% of all men and women have at least a few unwanted
hairs. Electrolysis is the only permanent method of hair removal
approved by physicians and health professionals as safe, effective and
permanent. Since its discovery in 1875 by Dr. Charles E. Michel, many
major advances have been made through the use of highly sophisticated
technology and professional skill. We all get tired of unwanted hair. We pluck, tweeze, wax, trim,
bleach, and use depilatories but it always comes back or becomes dark again.
Electrology has withstood the test of time for its Safety, Effectiveness, and
Permanency for most Men and Women of all Nationalities.
Electrolysis is a procedure in which individual
hairs are removed from the face or body. During the procedure, the growth
center of the hair is destroyed with chemical or heat energy/ The FDA
recognizes only electrolysis as a permanent method of removing hair.
Electrolysis facts:
Permanent hair removal for most consumers if performed
correctly (which requires considerable training and skill)
Description
A
hair-thin metal probe is slid into a hair follicle.
Proper
insertion does not puncture the skin.
Electricity
is delivered to the follicle through the probe, which causes localized
damage to the areas that generate hairs.
Advantages
By
far the best and longest track record of results.
Over
125 years of clinically proven safety and effectiveness. [1]
Disadvantages
Can
be expensive.
Can
be painful.
Can
be tedious.
Can
be difficult for large amounts of hair.
If
done improperly, it can result in:
partial
to full re-growth
lasting
skin damage
spread
of infection
Regulation
varies by state, so inadequate controls exist to ensure competent
practitioners.
Re-growth
rates have not been accurately established and cannot be predicted due to
numerous variables.
|
History Although
several researchers were apparently experimenting with
electrical epilation after the Civil War, it's generally
accepted that St. Louis ophthalmologist Charles Michel
was the first to discover and publish permanent hair
removal results with an electrified needle. [7]
In 1875, Dr. Michel reported he
had been successfully using a battery-powered needle
epilator to treat ingrown eyelashes (trichiasis) since
1869. [8] This DC powered method was called electrolysis
because a chemical reaction in the hair follicle causes
sodium hydroxide to form, which damages the follicle.
It's also sometimes called galvanic electrolysis.
Use of electrolysis for hair
removal continued through the early part of the 20th
century. Its commercial popularity as a cosmetic
treatment was briefly eclipsed by x-ray hair removal,
which was advertised as both “painless” and “harmless”
(only one of which was true, of course).
Subsequent innovations in the
field included the use of multiple needles, developed by
Paul Kree in 1916, and the use of AC electricity, which
causes thermal damage within the follicle. [9] This was
first reported in medical literature in 1924 by Dr.
Henri Bordier, following over a decade of
experimentation by numerous researchers. [10] This
method was called diathermy by Bordier and is also
called thermolysis, short-wave, high-frequency (HF),
radio-frequency (RF), etc.
Incremental improvements in the
equipment and technique continued through World War II.
At that time, Arthur Hinkel and Henri St. Pierre applied
for a patent for a blend method they'd been developing.
They received their patent in 1948, and 20 years later
published the groundbreaking book Electrolysis,
Thermolysis and the Blend, discussing their use of
scientific techniques to improve the method. [11] In the
wake of Hinkel's book, several other useful practical
overviews have been written. [4, 5, 6]
The second half of the 20th
century saw more incremental equipment improvements
incorporating transistors and computerized controls, as
well as insulated probes and sterile disposable probes.
Despite improvements in
equipment, electrolysis remains highly dependent on the
skill of the practitioner. Electrolysis trade groups
have set standards for member certification, but many
U.S. states do not regulate the practice of
electrolysis. [12] For this reason, it's very important
for consumers to go to a practitioner recommended by
someone who is done and happy with the results.
References
- Please
see my selected list of
published
electrolysis medical literature.
-
Caldwell IW.
The
electronic pencil.
British Medical Journal,
1972, 03 Jun(813):591-592.
- Please
see hairfacts.com for a
discussion of
home-use
personal electrolysis units:
cons and pros.
- Gior
F. Modern Electrology: Excess
Hair, Its Causes and Treatments,
3d ed. 2000 and Published by
Hair Publishing, Inc., Roslyn,
New York 11576. (previous
edition from Tarrytown NY:
Milady Publishing, 1987) ISBN:
0-87350-413-5
-
Richards RN, Meharg GE. Cosmetic
and Medical Electrolysis and
Temporary Hair Removal: A
practice manual and reference
guide. Toronto: Medric Ltd.
1991. ISBN: 0-9694746-0-1. Pages
37-40.
- Bono
M. Real world electrology: the
blend method. Santa Barbara, CA:
Tortoise Press, 1994. ISBN:
0-9642682-0-5
- But
see Wagner RF Jr, Brysk H,
Tyring SK.
Revisiting
the Michel/Green controversy of
1879: was Carron du Villards the
first to use probe/needle
electrolysis for permanent hair
destruction?
International Journal of
Dermatology 1997
Dec;36(12):947-51.
- Michel
CE. Trichiasis and distichiasis;
with an improved method for
radical treatment. St. Louis
Clinical Record, 1875 Oct;
2:145-148
-
Richards (1991) page 39.
Available online via
American
Electrology Association.
-
Bordier H. [New treatment for
hypertrichosis with diathermy].
Vie Medicale, 1924, 5:561
[article in French]
- Hinkel
AR, Lind RW. Electrolysis,
Thermolysis and the Blend: the
principles and practice of
permanent hair removal. Los
Angeles, CA: Arroway Publishers,
1968. ISBN 0-9600284-1-2
- Please
see hairfacts.com for a list of
states
that regulate electrolysis.
-
Chernosky ME.
Permanent
removal of superfluous hair.
Texas Medicine, 1971,
67:72-78.
-
Johnson E.
Epilation
of growing hair follicles.
Journal of Expermimental Zoology
1975 May;192(2):259-63.
- Wagner
RF Jr, Tomich JM, Grande DJ.
Electrolysis and thermolysis for
permanent hair removal.
Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology 1985
Mar;12(3):441-9.
- Hobbs
ER, Ratz JL, James B.
Electrosurgical epilation.
Dermatologic Clinics 1987
Apr;5(2):437-44.
- Vogt
HJ [Formation
of keloids after
electroepilation].
[Article in German] Hautarzt
1973 May;24(5):203-4.
-
Ditmars DM Jr, Maguina P.
Neck skin
sporotrichosis after
electrolysis.
Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgery 1998 Feb;101(2):504-6.
-
Petrozzi JW.
Verrucae
planae spread by electrolysis.
Cutis, 1980, 26:85.
-
Dumesic DA, Herrmann RR, O'Brien
AM.
Estimated
prevalence of undiagnosed
glucose intolerance from
hyperandrogenic anovulation
among women requesting
electrolysis.
International Journal of
Fertility and Womens Medicine
1997 Jul-Aug;42(4):255-60.
-
Verdich J [Treatment of
hypertrichosis in women by means
of electroepilation]
Ugeskrift for Laeger,
141:2056-2057.
-
Richards RN, Meharg GE.
Electrolysis: observations from
13 years and 140,000 hours of
experience.
Journal of the American Academy
of Dermatology. 1995
Oct;33(4):662-6.
-
Kobayashi T, Kamiyama G.
Electroepilation using insulated
needles.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
1987;11(4):223-7.
-
Urushibata O, Kase K.
A
comparative study of axillar
hair removal in women: plucking
versus the blend method.
Journal of Dermatology 1995
Oct;22(10):738-42.
|
|
STATES THE REQUIRE LICENSES (subject to
change)
|
|
Mary Morris offers a Complimentary
Initial Electrology Consultation and demonstration in her clinic or
Academy Call 386-299-5175 for information.
All in Private.
Men & Women Welcome
|

"For a healthier happier you"

Skin Chart

No more shaving |